Why 2025 is a pivotal year to adopt carbon management software

40% of sustainability leaders use dedicated carbon management software. Learn why 2025 is the right time to make the switch.

Only 24% of companies are using dedicated carbon management software, according to our latest research. But that number tells just part of the story. For companies with $1B-$10B in revenue, adoption jumps to 37%. Among organizations with the most mature sustainability programs, that figure climbs to 40%.

The pattern is clear: the most sophisticated sustainability programs have already made the switch from generic business intelligence tools to purpose-built solutions—is it time for everyone else to follow suit?

For corporate sustainability teams who still use general-purpose tools like Tableau and PowerBI (currently 38% of organizations), 2025 is shaping up to be a critical decision point.

The state of carbon management in 2025

Where general purpose tools fall short

When companies kick off their first emissions inventory, or manage carbon accounting with a small, scrappy team, they often deploy basic tools like spreadsheets. This works until it doesn’t. The breaking point hits when sustainability teams realize they’re spending more time wrestling with data than driving actual decarbonization. According to our research, 41% of companies rank data management as their biggest carbon accounting challenge.

New regulations are further forcing the issue. California’s SB 253 and Europe’s CSRD don’t just require numbers—they demand verifiable data trails and transparent methodology. Generic tools can’t deliver this. When auditors demand evidence chains and verified calculations, teams using spreadsheets face a stark choice: upgrade or risk non-compliance.

Beyond compliance, the cost of sticking with outdated tools is missed opportunity. While some teams scramble to meet reporting deadlines, others are using advanced platforms to engage suppliers, streamline operations, and capture market advantage.

Why mature programs are switching to dedicated carbon management software

Tracking emissions across complex global operations—not to mention their supply chains—is not a job for spreadsheets. Leaders who switch to purpose-built solutions are doing it because they need systems that can handle complex data hierarchies and integrate seamlessly with existing sustainability tech stacks.

Purpose-built carbon management solutions are designed to handle complexity and the transparency demands of corporate emissions regulations. These requirements are built into their foundation, with clear audit trails, automated data validation, and standardized calculation methodologies.

While basic BI tools just visualize data, dedicated platforms automate the entire carbon accounting workflow—from data collection through to reporting. They offer supplier portals for upstream emissions data, real-time tracking dashboards, and automated report generation for a variety of reporting frameworks.

The competitive edge is clear: companies using dedicated solutions spend less time crunching numbers and more time driving decarbonization. They’re faster at reporting, more confident in their data accuracy, and better at engaging suppliers to reduce scope 3 emissions. Most importantly, they’re ready for what’s coming. While others rush to comply with new regulations, these companies are already focused on the next challenge: turning emissions data into market advantage.

Why 2025 is the tipping point

2025 isn’t an arbitrary deadline—it’s a convergence point. California’s SB 253 and SB 261 reporting starts in 2026, with data from 2025. The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive goes live for large companies in 2025. Sustainability disclosure rules are strengthening around the globe, and investors are demanding better data.

Add to this a typical 6-9 month implementation timeline for new software, and 2025 becomes a critical moment to get ahead of these requirements. The 40% of sustainability leaders who’ve already made the switch to dedicated platforms did the math: leaving this decision until reporting deadlines are imminent means rushing a complex transition under pressure. The smarter play is to start now.

Making the business case

The ROI equation for carbon management software is straightforward: you’re trading upfront costs for efficiency gains and risk reduction. Manual data processes that take weeks with spreadsheets become automated. Compliance risks drop significantly—crucial when facing regulations like California’s SB 253, which includes fines up to $500,000 per reporting period for inaccurate data.

That said, it’s essential to be clear-eyed about the costs. You’re looking at implementation fees, annual licensing, and potential fees for ongoing support. Most vendors charge based on company revenue or emission source complexity. Some vendors will also hand you off to a third party for implementation—racking up additional fees for professional services. Try to find a software partner that will be clear and comprehensive on pricing up-front.

Action plan for 2025

If you’re considering a dedicated carbon management platform, timing matters:

  • Q1–Q2: Assess your current tools and processes. Identify pain points and build a requirements list.
  • Q2–Q3: Evaluate vendors. Look for scalability, integrations, and support. Prioritize platforms that align with your growth and reporting needs.
  • Q3–Q4: Start implementation. Roll out in phases—begin with internal teams before expanding to stakeholders and suppliers.

Implementation isn’t just software deployment—it’s organizational change. Roll out in phases, starting with your core team, then key stakeholders, then suppliers. Set clear success metrics: data accuracy rates, reporting cycle time, supplier response rates. This isn’t about perfect execution—it’s about steady progress toward better data, faster reporting, and real emissions reduction.

The shift to dedicated carbon management software isn’t just a trend for the biggest, most well-resourced sustainability programs—it’s a proven path forward, as demonstrated by the 40% of sustainability leaders who have already made the transition. With regulatory deadlines approaching and market pressures mounting, the question isn’t whether to make the switch, but how to execute it effectively.

Ready to join the leaders in carbon management? Contact us for a no-pressure assessment of your program’s readiness for dedicated solutions.

Previous Back to all posts

Sign up to stay up to date with Optera and the latest developments in corporate sustainability.